Global Trends & Insights: Higher Education Research https://arvinfomedia.com/myjournals/index.php/GTIHER <p><strong>Global Trends and Insights: Higher Education Research</strong> is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing high-quality original research articles, comprehensive reviews, and selected high-impact reprints in the field of higher education studies. The journal emphasizes research that advances theoretical understanding, empirical investigation, policy development, and innovative practices in higher education. It provides an interdisciplinary platform for scholars, educators, administrators, and policymakers to integrate insights from educational policy, leadership, administration, pedagogy, technology, and assessment, fostering strategies that enhance academic quality, student engagement, institutional effectiveness, and global competitiveness.</p> <p>Published half-yearly, the journal is available in both print and electronic formats, ensuring wide accessibility to the research community.</p> en-US Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:43:53 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.8 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Reconceptualizing Internationalization: Co-Authorship Among Locals, Returnees and Internationals in Research-Intensive Universities in China https://arvinfomedia.com/myjournals/index.php/GTIHER/article/view/471 <p>The contribution of internationality in pursuing research is well-known. Whilst the policy agenda in many Asian countries includes attracting academic staff (Internationals and Returnees—conceptualized here under Simmel's ‘stranger’ concept), little is known in relation to how often they work with colleagues at their institutions and, consequently, how much such collaboration yields benefits when it comes to publishing. We investigate, via observable co-authorships, the quality of publications out of different combinations of institutional collaborations in research-intensive Chinese mainland universities to unpack otherwise hidden patterns of institutional internationality. Checking a variety of covariates derived from funding acknowledgements and extra-institutional co-authorships, we predict which collaboration combinations are more likely to generate higher citations over Scopus or higher likelihood of publishing in ‘Q1’ journals. The findings reveal that, although Internationals and Returnees can bring valuable aspects in terms of internationality to institutions, they are relatively scarcely involved in co-authoring. Nevertheless, when internationals and/or Returnees publish with Locals, those circumstances reveal high degrees of success. Moreover, not all combinations yield advantages to the same extent, building up evidence that internationality within institutions is beneficial but at the same time dependent on specific research goals.</p> Giulio Marini, Yangson Kim Copyright (c) 2026 Global Trends & Insights: Higher Education Research https://arvinfomedia.com/myjournals/index.php/GTIHER/article/view/471 Mon, 19 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000